Metastatic Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Kelch-Like Protein-11 IgG Brainstem Encephalitis.

Kelch-like protein-11 (KLHL11)-IgG is associated with rhombencephalitis and seminoma. It has not previously been described as a neurologic immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related adverse event (nirAE) or in association with esophageal adenocarcinoma. We describe a 61-year-old man with metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), and nivolumab, who subsequently developed diplopia, vertigo, and progressive gait ataxia after 8 weeks of treatment. Owing to a concern for ICI-associated myasthenia gravis, nivolumab was held and he was treated with prednisone and pyridostigmine. EMG showed no neuromuscular junction dysfunction, and acetylcholine-receptor antibodies were negative. Brain MRI was unrevealing. Murine brain tissue immunofluorescence assay revealed KLHL11-IgG in both serum and CSF, confirmed by cell-based assay. Tumor histopathology demonstrated poorly differentiated, highly proliferative adenocarcinoma with increased mitotic figures and cytoplasmic KLHL11 immunoreactivity. He was initiated on 6 months of cyclophosphamide in addition to FOLFOX for post-ICI-associated KLHL11-IgG rhombencephalitis. We report KLHL11-IgG rhombencephalitis associated with poorly differentiated esophageal cancer as a novel nirAE. Tumor staining revealed KLHL11 immunoreactivity, supporting a cancer-antigen-driven ICI-associated paraneoplastic syndrome. Recognition of novel nirAEs can expedite treatment and potentially prevent progressive neurologic disability.

De novo metastatic versus recurrent gastroesophageal cancer: A single-centre retrospective analysis.

282 Background: Outcomes remain poor for patients with metastatic gastric, gastroesophageal and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC) with median survival of 14 months with combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy as per the Checkmate 649 trial. There is limited data to clarify if any differences exist between denovo metastatic and recurrent GEAC in terms of survival and response to systemic therapy. We compare the baseline characteristics and outcomes for patients with denovo metastatic and recurrent GEAC in our cohort. Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was conducted to include patients with metastatic GEAC reviewed at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between 2007 and 2021. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, race, performance status and Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) were reviewed. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression free survival on first line (PFS1) and second line (PFS2) systemic therapy and disease-free interval (DFI) in the recurrent group (defined as time between initial diagnosis and development of recurrent disease). OS was calculated from diagnosis of stage IV disease. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan Meier curves were used to compare OS, PFS1 and PFS2. Outcomes were adjusted for baseline characteristics. The effect of DFI on outcomes was evaluated in the recurrent group. Results: Our cohort consisted of 619 cases, of which 456 (73.6%) were denovo metastatic and 163(26.4%) were recurrent. The majority (71%) were male, non-Asian (85%) and median age for the cohort was 60 years. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and biomarker status (HER2, MSI) between denovo and recurrent groups. Number of metastatic sites was significantly higher in denovo group (Mean:2.3 vs 1.8, p<0.001). A significantly higher percentage of patients received immunotherapy in the first line setting in the recurrent group (8% vs 4%, p:0.04). Using multivariate cox regression and after adjusting for age, performance status and CCI, there was a significant difference in OS favoring recurrent group (aHR:0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.86, p=<0.001). Using Kaplan Meier curves, median OS was 18.08 months in the recurrent group vs 14.62 months in the denovo metastatic group. There was a significant difference in PFS1 using a multivariate model in favor of the recurrent group (aHR 0.81,95% CI 0.67-0.99, p=0.04), as well as similar improvement in PFS2 for the recurrent group (aHR:0.69,95% CI 0.52-0.92, p=0.01). In the recurrent group, OS did not differ significantly between DFI <6 months, 6-12 months or >12 months. Conclusions: Our results show a significantly better OS, PFS1 and PFS 2 for recurrent as compared to denovo metastatic GEAC for patients treated in the 1st line metastatic setting in a large single-centre retrospective analysis. More in depth analysis of molecular differences in patient tumors is underway and may help to explain better outcomes.

Abstract 14751: A Rare Presentation of 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Background: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is associated with numerous cardiotoxic effects, most commonly chest pain and acute coronary syndrome. Less common effects include arrhythmias, myocarditis, pericarditis, and heart failure. We present a rare case of 5-FU causing cardiogenic shock. Case: A 54-year-old man with metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma presented at 3:50 with chest pain that began the day before at 16:00, shortly after starting a 5-FU pump. Electrocardiogram (EKG) showed normal sinus rhythm with no ST or T wave changes. High sensitivity troponin T was 18 ng/L, followed by 24 ng/L at 1 hour and 81 ng/L at 6 hours. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) ruled out pulmonary embolism. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed a globally reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35-40%. The patient received metoprolol and was scheduled for coronary CTA to investigate for coronary disease. Over the next few hours, he continued to report chest pain. Repeat troponin at 18:12 was 235 ng/L. Repeat EKG showed new anterior ST depressions. Posterior EKG did not show ST elevations. Repeat TTE revealed LVEF of 15%. The patient underwent left and right heart catheterization at 21:14, which showed normal coronary arteries, pulmonary artery pressure 50/31 mmHg (mean 38 mmHg), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 36 mmHg, and cardiac index 1.1 L/min/m 2 . An Impella device was placed for circulatory support. He was treated with vasopressors and milrinone. Given concern for 5-FU toxicity, he received the antidote uridine triacetate 10 g IV every 6 hours for 5 days. LVEF improved to 70%. He was treated with nifedipine for possible coronary vasospasm. He was discharged 8 days later with heart failure medications. Conclusion: The incidence of cardiotoxicity from 5-FU ranges from 1.2-18%. Mechanistic theories include coronary vasospasm and direct cellular injury. Symptoms usually present within 12 hours of initiation but may present up to 2 days later. Management includes stopping the offending agent and starting anti-anginal drugs and uridine triacetate. Uridine triacetate is deacetylated to uridine, which prevents cell damage and death via competitive inhibition of 5-FU.

1533P Advantig-105: Phase Ib dose-expansion study of ociperlimab (OCI) + tislelizumab (TIS) with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)

1533P Advantig-105: Phase Ib dose-expansion study of ociperlimab (OCI) + tislelizumab (TIS) with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)

A population-based comparison of patients with metastatic esophagogastric carcinoma between Japan and the Netherlands

PurposeDifferences exist between Asian and Western patients with esophagogastric cancer, for example in terms of histological subtype and treatment strategies. This study aimed to compare characteristics and treatment between patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer from Japan and the Netherlands using nationwide cancer registry data.MethodsPatients diagnosed with metastatic esophageal or gastric cancer were included from the nationwide national cancer registry of Japan (2016–2019) and the Netherlands (2015–2020). Treatment strategies were analyzed using chi-squared tests.ResultsThe proportion of patients with metastatic esophageal (16.0% vs 34.2%) and gastric cancer (14.9% vs 45.2%) were lower in Japan compared to the Netherlands. Japanese patients with metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or gastric cancer (GC) were more often male and older compared to Dutch patients. Proportion of patients with metastatic disease who received surgical resection was higher in Japan compared to the Netherlands (EAC 9.3 vs 1.4%, p < 0.001; ESCC 10.7% vs 2.3%, p < 0.001; GC 12.0% vs 3.6% p < 0.001). Proportion of patients who received systemic therapy was also higher (EAC 44.8% vs 30.4%, p < 0.001; ESCC 26.6% vs 12.0%, p < 0.001; GC 50.7% vs 35.8% p < 0.001).ConclusionsJapanese patients less often presented with metastatic esophagogastric cancer and more often underwent surgical resection or received systemic therapy compared to Dutch patients. Further investigation should elucidate what the deliberations are in both Japan and the Netherlands and if more patients in the Netherlands could benefit from surgical resection or systemic therapy and whether this would translate in better survival and quality of life.

STAR-221: A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial of domvanalimab, zimberelimab, and chemotherapy versus nivolumab and chemotherapy in previously untreated, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

TPS4206 Background: The addition of programmed cell death/ligand protein 1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors to standard chemotherapy has improved outcomes in patients with HER2-negative unresectable or metastatic esophago-gastric adenocarcinomas. Current first-line (1L) treatment for these patients comprises FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil) and CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy, with or without the addition of a PD-1 inhibitor. Domvanalimab (dom) is an Fc-silent humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that blocks T cell Immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT), reducing immunosuppression of T/natural killer (NK) cells and promoting antitumor activity. Zimberelimab (zim) and nivolumab are mAbs that bind to PD-1 on T/NK cells, preventing the immunosuppressive effects of PD-L1 and leading to enhanced immune-mediated tumor cell death. Prior studies (including ARC-7) have demonstrated that the combination of dom + zim is safe, tolerable, and has promising activity in patients with lung cancer and esophago-gastric cancers. This study will investigate whether adding anti-TIGIT therapy to the standard combination of anti-PD-1 therapy and chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric, GEJ, and esophageal adenocarcinoma provides additional clinical benefit. Methods: STAR-221 (NCT05568095) is a global, phase 3, randomized, open-label study. Eligible patients are adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric, GEJ, or esophageal adenocarcinoma treated in the 1L setting with ≥1 measurable lesion(s) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with known HER2-positive tumors are not eligible. Approximately 970 patients will be randomized 1:1 into 1 of 2 treatment arms. Patients randomized to Arm A will receive either dom 1600 mg + zim 480 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in addition to FOLFOX chemotherapy once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or dom 1200 mg + zim 360 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) in addition to CAPOX chemotherapy Q3W. Patients randomized to Arm B will receive either nivolumab 240 mg Q2W + FOLFOX Q2W or nivolumab 360 mg Q3W + CAPOX Q3W. Randomization will be stratified by PD-L1 expression (tumor area positivity [TAP] ≥ 5% vs TAP &lt; 5%), ECOG performance status (0 vs 1), and region (USA, Canada, and EU5 countries vs Asia vs rest of world). The dual primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat population and OS in patients with high PD-L1 expression (TAP ≥ 5%). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and safety and tolerability. STAR-221 is currently enrolling globally. Clinical trial information: NCT05568095 .

Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Metastatic to the Choroid with Extrascleral Extension

A 78-year-old man with history of esophageal adenocarcinoma, in remission 9 months after resection, chemotherapy, and radiation, presented with a peripapillary choroidal lesion with leopard-spot pigmentation and disc edema (A). Extraocular extension was demonstrated on B-scan and magnetic resonance imaging (B, C). A transconjunctival orbitotomy approach was performed rather than choroidal fine-needle biopsy to maximize tissue yield. Histopathology revealed expression of keratin (D), cytokeratin 20, caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX-2), and cytokeratin 7, consistent with metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma. Positron emission tomography scan showed no primary tumor recurrence or additional metastases (Magnified version of Figure A-D is available online at www.aaojournal.org).

Abstract #1406407: A Rare Case of Pituitary Metastasis from Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Metastases to the pituitary gland are uncommon. Metastatic lesions represent < 1 % of sellar masses (1). Breast and lungs are the most common primary tumors associated with pituitary metastasis, representing nearly 60% of cases (1). Esophageal adenocarcinoma is a very rare cause of pituitary metastasis and only a few cases have been reported. We present a very rare case of a patient with pituitary metastasis from esophageal adenocarcinoma. 49-year-old male presented with a 2-month history of progressive fatigue, chills, lightheadedness, poor appetite, headaches, and decreased peripheral vision. One month before admission he was diagnosed with an invasive moderately differentiated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Head CT showed a heterogeneous hyperdense pituitary mass. Pituitary MRI confirmed a 2.13 x 0.9 cm heterogeneously enhancing, lobulated sellar mass with suprasellar extension and at least 2 sub-centimeters areas of enhancement within the right frontal lobe. CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis with splenomegaly, multiple lesions in the lungs, liver, and bilateral adrenal glands, concerning for metastases. Laboratories showed a cortisol level of 1.2 mcg/dL, TSH 1.074 (0.46-4.7 uIU/mL), free T4 < 0.42 (0.7-1.30 ng/dL). Prolactin 3.9 (2.5-17.0 ng/mL)), LH < 0.1 (0.8-7.6 mIU/mL), FSH 0.9 (0.7-11.1 mIU/mL), total testosterone < 4.33 (240-871 ng/dL), and IGF-1 76 (53.3-215 ng/mL). No evidence of diabetes insipidus. The patient was started on levothyroxine 150 mcg daily and hydrocortisone 15 mg in the morning and 5 mg in the afternoon. Ophthalmologic evaluation showed multiple elevated retinal lesions in both eyes, concerning for metastatic implants. No acute intervention per neurosurgery. After discharge, an adrenal biopsy confirmed metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and was started on FOLFOX, trastuzumab, pembrolizumab, and zometa. MRI 3 months later showed decrease in size of enhancing lesion most suspicious for metastasis within the right frontal lobe and sella turcica. Pituitary metastases are usually diagnosed in the 6th and 7th decade of life with widespread metastatic disease. Esophageal adenocarcinoma is a rare cause of pituitary metastasis with few cases reported. Patients may be asymptomatic, but others may present with diabetes insipidus, visual disturbances, headaches, and panhypopituitarism (2). Our patient presented at a younger age with symptoms indicative of pituitary failure. Although these may be nonspecific, it is important to maintain awareness of them so that testing and treatment can be performed in a timely fashion.

The role of claudin 18.2 and HER-2 in pancreatic cancer outcomes.

To examine the prognostic value of claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) expression in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study enrolled patients who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with PDAC at Suleyman Demirel University Hospital, Turkey between 2015 and 2019. Sixty-eight patients with resected PDAC treated at a medical oncology clinic were assessed. All patients were over the age of 18 years, underwent follow-up and treatment in our unit, and had pathology slides that we could access. Clinicopathological data were obtained from medical files, including the patients' age, sex, pathological parameters, and clinical stage according to the Eighth International Union against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer. Patient survival and the period from the date of diagnosis to death were assessed in the follow-up data. There was no statistically significant difference between CLDN18.2 and HER-2 expression scores for samples and patient clinicopathological characteristics. No HER-2 expression scores of ≥2 were found in the samples. Only 25% (n = 17) of the samples had HER-2 expression scores of +1. CLDN18.2 expression was detected in 54.4% (n = 37) of the patient samples. CLDN18.2 expression scores were +1 in 30.8% (n = 21) of the patient samples, +2 in 16.2% (n = 11), and +3 in 7.4% (n = 5). When CLDN18.2 and HER-2 expression were compared, a statistically significant difference and moderate positive correlation were observed. No significant relationship between HER-2 expression and survival was observed in the survival analysis of PDAC patients; however, high CLDN18.2 expression was related to longer overall survival. Our study is the third to research CLDN18.2 expression in PDAC. HER-2 expression is low and CLDN18.2 expression is high in patients with PDAC. HER-2 expression is not related to overall survival but CLDN18.2 is related and may be used as a prognostic marker in patients with PDAC.

A phase 1, open-label, dose escalation and expansion, multicenter study of claudin 18.2-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic gastric, gastroesophageal junction, esophageal, or pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

TPS480 Background: Locally advanced and metastatic gastric, esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and pancreatic adenocarcinomas (GC, EC, GEJC, and PC) have poor overall survival, and more effective therapies are needed. Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), a tight junction protein, is commonly expressed in these cancers. Monoclonal antibody and CAR-T cell therapies targeting CLDN18.2 have shown promising antitumor activity (Türeci O et al, 2019; Qi C et al, 2022). This study aims to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of a CLDN18.2 targeted CAR-T, LB1908, in subjects with GC, EC, GEJC, and PC. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and expansion study of LB1908 that aims to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (NCT05539430; open to enrollment early 2023). During prescreening, that may occur as early as at initial diagnosis, we will screen subjects for tumor expression of CLDN18.2 by IHC of ≥ 1+ in ≥ 50% of tumor cells. Inclusion criteria include: must be ≥18 and ≤75 years old; histologically/cytologically confirmed unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the GC, EC, GEJC, and PC; progressed on at least standard 1st line therapy; ECOG PS 0 or 1; life expectancy &gt; 4 months per investigator judgment; and adequate organ function per protocol. The study has 2 parts. In Part A (dose escalation), 12 to 21 subjects with GC, EC, or GEJC will be enrolled in up to 3 planned dose level cohorts (0.5X106, 1.5X106, and 3.0X106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg), to determine the recommended dose for expansion (RDE). In Part B (dose expansion) the RDE will be administered to up to 35 subjects with GC, EC, and GEJC in one expansion cohort and PC in another cohort (n=11-17 for GC/EC/GEJ, to total 23 subjects when pooling with RDE-treated subjects from part A; n=18 for PC). LB1908 will be manufactured from autologous T cells collected via PMBC apheresis. Subjects may receive optional bridging therapy followed by lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2/day for 3 days. One infusion of LB1908 will then be administered, and subjects will be followed post-infusion for safety, laboratory, and disease assessments. Primary endpoints are incidence, duration, and severity of AEs and laboratory abnormalities (Parts A and B); and frequency of DLTs at each dose level (Part A). Secondary and exploratory endpoints include: objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, characterization of PK by CAR-positive T cell counts, CAR transgene level in blood, effusions, and target tissues, and evaluation of immunogenicity by presence of anti-LB1908 antibodies. Acknowledgments: This study is funded by Legend Biotech USA Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05539430 .

Differential prognostic significance of sarcopenia in metastatic esophageal squamous and adenocarcinoma.

Sarcopenia indicates poor prognosis in various malignancies. We evaluated the association of sarcopenia with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic esophageal cancer (MEC) patients, a population often presenting with poor nutritional status. In newly diagnosed MEC patients managed at the Princess Margaret (PM) Cancer Centre (diagnosed 2006-2015), total muscle area, visceral adiposity (VA), and subcutaneous adiposity (SA) were quantified on abdominal computed tomography at L3. Sarcopenia was determined using published cutoffs, based on sex and height. Of 202 MEC patients, most were male (166/82%), < 65years (116/57%), and had adenocarcinoma histology (141/70%); 110/54% had recurrent MEC after initial curative-intent treatment; 92/46% presented with de novo MEC. At stage IV diagnosis, 20/10% were underweight, 97/48% were normal-weight and 84/42% were overweight/obese; 103/51% were sarcopenic. Sarcopenia was associated with worse median OS (4.6 vs. 7.9months; log-rank p = 0.03) and 1-year survival, even after adjusting for other body composition variables (e.g., BMI, VA, and SA): adjusted-HR 1.51 [95% CI 1.1-2.2, p = 0.02]. In post hoc analysis, sarcopenia was highly prognostic in adenocarcinomas (p = 0.003), but not squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). In patients receiving palliative systemic treatment (104/51%), sarcopenia was associated with shorter PFS (p = 0.004) in adenocarcinoma patients (75/72%). In metastatic esophageal adenocarcinomas, sarcopenia is associated with worse PFS and OS. In metastatic esophageal SCC, there was a non-significant trend for worse PFS but no association with OS. In order to offset the poor prognosis associated with sarcopenia particularly in metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma patients, future research should focus on possible countermeasures.

Comparing treatment and outcomes in advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinomas: a population-based study.

Treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) follows the guidelines for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJC) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), but patients with EAC are often excluded from clinical studies of GEJC/GAC. Here we describe treatment and survival of patients with advanced EAC, GEJC, and GAC to provide population-based evidence on distinctions and similarities between these populations. Retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable advanced (cT4b) or metastatic (cM1) EAC, GEJC, or GAC (2015-2020) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression. In all, 7391 patients were included (EAC: n = 3346, GEJC: n = 1246, and GAC: n = 2798). Patients with EAC were more often males and more often had ⩾2 metastatic locations. First-line systemic therapy was received by 42%, 47%, and 36% of patients with EAC, GEJC, and GAC, respectively. Median OS was 5.0, 5.1, and 4.0 months for all patients with EAC, GEJC, and GAC, respectively (p < 0.001). Median OS from start of first-line therapy of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative adenocarcinomas was 7.6, 7.8, and 7.5 months (p = 0.12) and of patients with HER2-positive carcinoma receiving first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy was 11.0, 13.3, and 9.5 months (p = 0.37) in EAC, GEJC, and GAC, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, no difference in OS for patients with EAC, GEJC, and GAC was observed. Despite differences in clinical characteristics and treatment strategies, survival between patients with advanced EAC, GEJC, and GAC was similar. We advocate that EAC patients should not be excluded from clinical trials for patients with molecularly similar GEJC/GAC.

SOURCE beyond first-line: A survival prediction model for patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after failure of first-line palliative systemic therapy.

Prior models have been developed to predict survival for patients with esophagogastric cancer undergoing curative treatment or first-line chemotherapy (SOURCE models). Comprehensive clinical prediction models for patients with esophagogastric cancer who will receive second-line chemotherapy or best supportive care are currently lacking. The aim of our study was to develop and internally validate a new clinical prediction model, called SOURCE beyond first-line, for survival of patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after failure of first-line palliative systemic therapy. Patients with unresectable or metastatic esophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma (2015-2017) who received first-line systemic therapy (N=1067) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics at primary diagnosis and at progression of disease were used to develop the model. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed through forward and backward selection using Akaike's Information Criterion. The model was internally validated through 10-fold cross-validations to assess performance. Model discrimination (C-index) and calibration (slope and intercept) were used to evaluate performance of the complete and cross-validated models. The final model consisted of 11 patient tumor and treatment characteristics. The C-index was 0.75 (0.73-0.78), calibration slope 1.01 (1.00-1.01) and calibration intercept 0.01 (0.01-0.02). Internal cross-validation of the model showed that the model performed adequately on unseen data: C-index was 0.79 (0.77-0.82), calibration slope 0.93 (0.85-1.01) and calibration intercept 0.02 (-0.01 to 0.06). The SOURCE beyond first-line model predicted survival with fair discriminatory ability and good calibration.

EE284 Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy As First-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Cancer or HER2-Negative Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in France

EE284 Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy As First-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Cancer or HER2-Negative Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in France

Optimal First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus.

Opinion statementTreatment strategies for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients continue to advance with the generation of more data from clinical trials that are permitting us to refine the use of immunotherapy in combination with other treatment modalities. While the frontline therapy for metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma has become more complicated with the approval of combination regimens, it is also yielding better outcomes. These treatment strategies can now be individualized to fit patient circumstances and goals as well as the biomarker profile of their individual tumors leading to an increased likelihood of treatment related remissions and extended median survivals. Comprehensive genomic profiling at diagnosis should now be standard to allow the management team to customize each patient’s treatment plan based on the genetic abnormalities discovered in their tumor. By refining these targeted approaches, we will see decreased toxicities and increased survival.

S2429 A Rare Case of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Presenting as an Isolated Brain Lesion 6 Years After Treatment

Introduction: Esophageal adenocarcinomas account for ∼1% of all cancers in the U.S. The prevalence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases associated with these cancers is around 1.8%. Response rates to standard of care are poor and prognosis is dismal. Often CNS involvement is associated with widely metastatic disease, herein, we present a case of a solitary brain lesion from esophageal adenocarcinoma at first recurrence. Case Description/Methods: A 72-year-old-male with a 40 pack-year smoking presented with progressive dysphagia in March 2015. Contrast enhanced CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis revealed a constricting mass at the esophagogastric junction that led to endoscopy guided biopsy revealing esophageal adenocarcinoma. He underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin/5-fluorouracil) and radiation therapy followed by esophagogastrectomy in July of 2015 where diagnosis of stage IIIBT3N2cM0 esophageal adenocarcinoma was confirmed. Clinical and imaging surveillance for 6 years had not shown any progression of cancer. However, in June of 2021, he presented with altered mental status that led to contrast enhanced brain MRI showing a T2 hyperintense left parietal lobe mass with an 8 mm midline shift and surrounding vasogenic edema (Figure). FDG PET-CT head to toes did not show extracranial recurrence. He underwent left posterior temporal craniotomy for resection of tumor confirming the diagnosis of metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma. IHC showed positivity of cytokeratin7, CDX2 and SATB2. Whole exome sequencing revealed mutations in ARID1A, FH, and TP53 with variants of unknown significance of ATM and CDH. Tumor displayed proficient mismatch repair protein, a combined positive score of 15 for PD-L1, and negative Her2/Neu. Further sequencing showed tumor mutational burden of 4, no genomic loss of heterozygosity, and stable microsatellite repeats. He received gamma-knife radiation to the solitary left temporal lobe lesion. Patient continues to maintain his quality of life with no evidence of clinical and radiographic recurrence. Discussion: Isolated brain metastasis from esophageal adenocarcinoma is a very rare phenomenon. Limited data suggests that the survival of patients with isolated CNS lesions is < 1 year, however, achieving pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy has shown to improve survival. These esophageal cancers with isolated CNS metastases may share a unique genomic profile and more research is required to understand their alterations.Figure 1.: MRI of the brain. 1A- Pre-op axial OLEA of L. temporal lobe tumor (06/2021), 1B- Pre-op axial coronal T1 (06/2021), 1C- Follow-up T2 MRI.

A machine learning model predicting candidates for surgical treatment modality in patients with distant metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.

ObjectiveTo explore the role of surgical treatment modality on prognosis of metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma (mEAC), as well as to construct a machine learning model to predict suitable candidates.MethodAll mEAC patients pathologically diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A 1:4 propensity score-matched analysis and a multivariate Cox analysis were performed to verify the prognostic value of surgical treatment modality. To identify suitable candidates, a machine learning model, classification and regression tree (CART), was constructed, and its predictive performance was evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsOf 4520 mEAC patients, 2901 (64.2%) were aged over 60 years and 4012 (88.8%) were males. There were 411 (9.1%) patients receiving surgical treatment modality. In the propensity score-matched analysis, surgical treatment modality was significantly associated with a decreased risk of death (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.40-0.55); surgical patients had almost twice as much median survival time (MST) as those without resection (MST with 95% CI: 23 [17-27] months vs. 11 [11-12] months, P <0.0001). The similar association was also observed in the multivariate Cox analysis (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.41-0.53). Then, a CART was constructed to identify suitable candidates for surgical treatment modality, with a relatively good discrimination ability (AUC with 95% CI: 0.710 [0.648-0.771]).ConclusionSurgical treatment modality may be a promising strategy to prolong survival of mEAC patients. The CART in our study could serve as a useful tool to predict suitable candidates for surgical treatment modality. Further creditable studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Nivolumab (Opdivo)

&#x0D; CADTH reimbursement reviews are comprehensive assessments of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient and clinician perspectives, of a drug or drug class.&#x0D; The assessments inform non-binding recommendations that help guide the reimbursement decisions of Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec.&#x0D; This review assesses nivolumab (Opdivo) for injection, IV infusion, 10 mg nivolumab/mL, 40 mg and 100 mg single-use vials.&#x0D; Indication: Opdivo in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, for the treatment of adult patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal adenocarcinoma.&#x0D;

Abstract 4008: Transcriptomic signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define distinct subtypes with therapeutic relevance

Abstract Background &amp; Aims: Esophageal cancer is the fifth most common solid cancer globally, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the predominant histological subtype in the western world. Patients often present at an advanced stage and overall-5-year survival rates are less than 15%. In many patients, the response to neoadjuvant therapy is encouraging at first, but most will develop metastatic disease several years later. Recently, we observed plasticity along the epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) axis in EAC tumor cells upon therapeutic pressure. The last decade has seen the discovery of static molecular subtypes in cancers and a poor-prognosis mesenchymal subtype has been reported in multiple gastrointestinal cancers, but not in EAC. Here, we set out to identify transcriptomic subtypes and the frequency of their occurrence during EAC progression, and exposure to therapy in a clinical setting. Methods: A cohort comprising of 174 esophageal cancer cases (n=100 pre-treatment biopsies, n=46 neoadjuvantly-treated resection specimens, and n=28 metastatic biopsies) with 12 esophageal cancer cell lines (8 primary and 4 ATCC cell lines) was RNA-sequenced. To circumvent non-tumor signals confounding the analysis, we leveraged non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) as a virtual microdissection tool. Patients were subtyped by consensus clustering the top 50 exemplar genes per tumor-cell intrinsic signature. Next, the subtypes were validated in two independent cohorts and clinical correlates were analyzed. In addition, we perturbed subtype-specific regulators to functionally assess the existence of the subtypes. Results: Here, we identified 7 biological signatures involved in primary and metastatic EAC. Two of these were unambiguously tumor-intrinsic signals. All seven signatures associated with tumor cellularity scores estimated by an experienced pathologist confirming the reliability of NMF as a virtual microdissection tool. Upon clustering two EAC subtypes emerged: Intestinal-like (IL) and Mesenchymal-like (ML). ML-subtyped patients were observed with increased frequency after neoadjuvant treatment, and following metastatic dissemination. This association was validated in an independent cohort. Lastly, we identified HMGA2 as a key transcription factor for the ML-subtype. Genetic perturbation of HMGA2 induced an IL-associated phenotype. Conclusion: Our study demonstrate for the first time from clinical transcriptomics data that EAC cells can exist in distinct cell states. In addition, the abundance of either cell states, that constitute to tumor subtype, alter when exposed to chemoradiation or following metastatic spread. These subtypes offer a valuable method to design more informed personalized treatment approaches for EAC patients; for existing and future subtype-directed treatments. Citation Format: Mark P.G. Dings, Amber P. Zalm, Marjolein F. Lansbergen, César Oyarce, Sybren L. Meijer, Cynthia Waasdorp, Jan Paul Medema, Hanneke van Laarhoven, Maarten F. Bijlsma. Transcriptomic signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define distinct subtypes with therapeutic relevance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 4008.

Multicenter phase II study of abemaciclib and ramucirumab in metastatic esophageal/gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

TPS4169 Background: Cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) are serine/threonine kinases that are responsible for phosphorylating the intracellular proteins that coordinate cell-cycle progression. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular analysis of esophageal/gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) carcinomas has highlighted significant dysregulation of CDKN2A, the gene coding for the tumor suppressor p16, through deletion, mutation or epigenetic silencing in up to 76% of cases and the associated significant upregulation of the CDK4/6-Cyclin D-axis (The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature 2017). Preclinical experiments demonstrated that single agent abemaciclib has potent antitumor efficacy both in vitro and in vivo in esophageal adenocarcinoma with direct pathway inhibition (Kosovec J et al. CDK4/6 dual inhibitor abemaciclib demonstrates compelling preclinical activity against esophageal adenocarcinoma: a novel therapeutic options for a deadly disease. Oncotarget 2017 Nov 1;8[59]). Significant activity was seen in the OE33 (p=0.048) and FLO1 (p=0.043) esophageal cancer cell lines while western blot revealed downregulation of Cyclin D, phospho-pRb, E2F1, and Cyclin A2 (Kosovec J et al, 2017). In vivo experiments , utilizing the Levrat model of end-to-side esophagojejunostomy performed on Sprague-Dawley rats demonstrated that 78.9% of animals given abemaciclib demonstrated &gt;20% tumor volume decrease (placebo 0%). Post treatment comparison between placebo and abemaciclib of qRT-PCR gene expression demonstrated downregulation of pathway correlates, including CDK4 (p=0.023), CDK6 (p=0.068), E2F1 (p=0.005), Rb1 (p=0.067), Cyclin D (p=0.031), and Cyclin A (p=0.039) (Kosovec J et al, 2017). The JPBJ phase 1b study has previously demonstrated the safety of combining abemaciclib with ramucirumab in NSCLC. Methods: Subjects with previously treated metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas are eligible for this study which is currently open and enrolling patients. Squamous cell and mixed histology with neuroendocrine features are excluded. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled across 3 sites at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, The Allegheny Health Network in Pittsburgh and at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore. The primary objective is to describe the safety profile of abemaciclib (150mg po bid) and ramucirumab (8mg/kg iv every 2 weeks) in this patient population as assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Secondary objectives are to assess response rate, progression free and overall survival. In addition, we will determine the rate of stable disease at 3 months post targeted therapy. Correlative studies investigating changes in the expression of selected serum/tissue genomic markers of interest will be performed. Clinical trial information: NCT04921904.